volcol Posted October 9, 2008 Report Posted October 9, 2008 Now this looks like one, I know I'll be buying. Released on the 10th, I have it pre-ordered with Student discount for
volcol Posted October 10, 2008 Author Report Posted October 10, 2008 been playing the game, the story is great, the best BiA story board yet and the graphics ( especially rain) are phenomenal. Here is a quick screenie, its gory , which in its self promices lots of fun !
.TuG.JJUK Posted October 11, 2008 Report Posted October 11, 2008 Whats the Multi player like and what game would you compare it to.
.TuG.-Breaker Posted October 11, 2008 Report Posted October 11, 2008 well i just purchased the new brothers in arms and are installing it right now
volcol Posted October 11, 2008 Author Report Posted October 11, 2008 Im trying out multiplayer right now, my advice, complete the game in medium mode before starting multiplayer.
volcol Posted October 13, 2008 Author Report Posted October 13, 2008 Multi-player, to be to the point, is a waste of time. I have never played multi-player as bad, its worse than MoH
.TuG.Tweak Posted October 14, 2008 Report Posted October 14, 2008 No it's not bad. The game is NOT a run and gun game, I played the first 2 to death and found the tactical aspect to be really well done. The game revolves round one team pinning and the other team flanking (this is still the basis of most military tactics). You order your teams to pinn the opposition while you flank. The multiplayer simply does the same. The current game and the previous 2 were widely praised for the multiplayer.
.TuG.Beaver Posted October 14, 2008 Report Posted October 14, 2008 No it's not bad. The game is NOT a run and gun game, I played the first 2 to death and found the tactical aspect to be really well done. The game revolves round one team pinning and the other team flanking (this is still the basis of most military tactics). You order your teams to pinn the opposition while you flank. The multiplayer simply does the same. The current game and the previous 2 were widely praised for the multiplayer. What fricking planet was this on? All the reviews that I've read of MP for the BIA series have been dire - the SP is spot on - but MP has always been an afterthought in this series.
.TuG.-Breaker Posted October 14, 2008 Report Posted October 14, 2008 well the game is quite interesting, both mp and sp side nice gameplay in my opinion, its the first of the bia series im playing^^(i mean hells highway)
.TuG.Tweak Posted October 14, 2008 Report Posted October 14, 2008 What fricking planet was this on? All the reviews that I've read of MP for the BIA series have been dire - the SP is spot on - but MP has always been an afterthought in this series. PC gamer and all the other magazines loved the MP side of it. I played MP a lot before I moved to GRAW1 and really enjoyed it. ??
volcol Posted October 15, 2008 Author Report Posted October 15, 2008 They didnt spend much time on the multiplayer, its a great game and could romice great multiplayer but, it lacking any form of fun in multiplayer. A) if your lucky you find a server with tactical players, in which case it is semi-bareable You find a server with MP adicts, who are pretty much unbeatable. or C) Your whole team gets raped by enemy armour.
Recommended Posts
Please sign in to comment
You will be able to leave a comment after signing in
Sign In Now